You have just spent ten minutes looking for a document you know you have, or you are about to download something for the second time.
A single test for whether your files are working, and four habits that make it pass.
A litigation solicitor specialising in evidence preservation and electronic discovery.
The central rule
Filing is not about neatness. It is about whether, at the bar table, with someone waiting, you can put your hand on the page. A system passes if you can find any document in ten seconds from its name alone. Everything else is decoration.
The ten-second test
Pick five documents from your chronology at random. For each, without opening any folder, say where it lives and what it is called. Then check. If you got fewer than five, the system is not yet reliable, whatever it looks like.
The usual failures, in order of frequency: the file exists in three places under three names; the file is in the Downloads folder under the name the sender's system gave it; the file is called FINAL, FINAL2 or "final really final"; the date in the name is in a different format from its neighbours so it sorts somewhere unexpected; the file is an email you never saved out of the mailbox.
Four fixes
- One indexed home, with backups. A document lives in the matter folder, in the sub-folder for its kind; the backup is a copy of the whole folder, not stray copies scattered about. Downloads is a loading dock, not storage: everything in it is moved the same day. An apparent duplicate is moved to a quarantine folder, not deleted, until you have checked that it is byte-for-byte identical and that it does not carry different provenance: a different email it arrived with, a different date, a different sender. A preservation obligation or an order may require you to keep it.
- No re-downloads. Before downloading anything from an email, a portal or a drive, search the matter folder for it by date or subject. If it is there, open that one. The "(1)" suffix is a sign the search was skipped.
- One date format. The naming guide uses YYMMDD at the front of every authored file. Received files keep the sender's name but go in a folder named by date. Mixed formats are the main reason sort order lies.
- Emails saved, not remembered. Every email that matters is printed to PDF and saved with its attachments beside it, named with the subject and tagged as an email, as a working copy. The original message stays in the mailbox, with its headers and attachment relationships, because that is the record. The correspondence log is built from the working copies.
A file called "Meridian_threatening_email.pdf" tells the other side what you thought of it in March, and looks worse in a court book in October. Name by what it is: sender, date, subject. The argument goes in the submissions, not the filename.
From Jordan's case file
Checklist
- Five random documents located from name alone in ten seconds each
- Downloads folder empty at the end of every working session
- Duplicates and "(1)" files quarantined, and removed only after a byte-for-byte check and a preservation check
- One date format at the front of every authored file
- Every email that matters saved as PDF with attachments beside it
- Evidence filenames neutral: sender, date, subject